Comments on: Review: Log4j Chainsaw v2 http://blog.outerthoughts.com/2006/03/review-log4j-chainsaw-v2/ > From inner thoughts to the outer limits of Alexandre Rafalovitch Mon, 03 Oct 2011 22:01:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 By: Anonymous http://blog.outerthoughts.com/2006/03/review-log4j-chainsaw-v2/comment-page-1/#comment-38 Anonymous Tue, 02 May 2006 07:09:00 +0000 http://blog.outerthoughts.com/?p=77#comment-38 Try 'exception exists' Try ‘exception exists’

]]> By: BlogicBlogger http://blog.outerthoughts.com/2006/03/review-log4j-chainsaw-v2/comment-page-1/#comment-37 BlogicBlogger Sun, 09 Apr 2006 16:33:00 +0000 http://blog.outerthoughts.com/?p=77#comment-37 Thank you Rami for your comment. Have you tried using 'Exception ~= SearchString'? It works for me. It could still be better of course, but there is at least something. Thank you Rami for your comment.

Have you tried using ‘Exception ~= SearchString’? It works for me. It could still be better of course, but there is at least something.

]]> By: Rami A. http://blog.outerthoughts.com/2006/03/review-log4j-chainsaw-v2/comment-page-1/#comment-36 Rami A. Sun, 09 Apr 2006 13:25:00 +0000 http://blog.outerthoughts.com/?p=77#comment-36 IMHO it's a nice tool, but 2 things prevented us from using it: 1> No ability to search string inside a logging message. The filter works for the logging-message title but not for the message itself. Say you want to look for all the exceptions - have not found the way to filter all the messages that their content contain 'Exception'. 2> No support over SDH. It seems that the new version does support this. Have not tried it yet. Best regards, Rami IMHO it’s a nice tool, but 2 things prevented us from using it:
1> No ability to search string inside a logging message. The filter works for the logging-message title but not for the message itself. Say you want to look for all the exceptions – have not found the way to filter all the messages that their content contain ‘Exception’.

2> No support over SDH.
It seems that the new version does support this. Have not tried it yet.

Best regards,

Rami

]]>